Here are a few questions you won’t hear asked of the parade of
Israeli officials crossing US television screens during the current
crisis in Gaza:
- What would you do if a foreign country was occupying your land?
- What does it mean that Israeli cabinet ministers deny Palestine’s right to exist?
- What should we make of a prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, who as opposition leader in the 1990s addressed a rally under a banner reading “Death to Arafat” a year after the Palestinian leader signed a peace accord with Israel?
These are contentious questions, to be
sure, and with complicated answers. But they are relevant to
understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict today. They also
parallel the issues routinely raised by American journalists with
Palestinian officials, pressing to consider how the US would react if it
were under rocket fire from Mexico, to explain why Hamas won’t
recognise Israel and to repudiate Palestinian anti-Semitism.
But
it’s a feature of much mainstream journalism in the US, not just an
issue of coverage during the last three weeks of the Gaza crisis, that
while one set of questions gets asked all the time, the other is heard
hardly at all.
In years of reporting from and about Israel, I’ve
followed the frequently robust debate in its press about whether
Netanyahu really wants a peace deal, about the growing power of
right-wing members inside the Israeli cabinet opposed to a Palestinian
state, about the creeping air of permanence to the occupation.
So
it has been all the more striking to discover a far narrower discourse
in Washington and the notoriously pro-Israel mainstream media in the US
at a time when difficult questions are more important than ever. John
Kerry, the US secretary of state, and a crop of foreign leaders have ratcheted up warnings
that the door for the two-state solution is closing, in no small part
because of Israel’s actions. But still the difficult questions go
unasked.
Take Netanyahu’s appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation on
Sunday. The host, Bob Schieffer, permitted the Israeli leader to make a
lengthy case for the his military’s ground attack, guiding him along with one sympathetic question after another.
Finally, after describing Netanyahu’s position as “very
understandable”, Schieffer asked about dead Palestinian civilians – but
only to wonder if they presented a public relations problem in “the
battle for world opinion”.
read more >>
No comments:
Write comments